Showing posts with label How To. Show all posts
Showing posts with label How To. Show all posts

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Winning Elections

How the Left has Won

The way to win elections is very simple. A candidate must locate supporters, motivate them, and mobilize them. The Left has beaten us at this very simple game, despite being woefully outnumbered in the American population and woefully deficient in the marketplace of ideas, because they’ve controlled the messaging via the media and because they’ve effectively leveraged their influence through the community organizing/agitating tactics of Saul Alinsky.

The mainstream media’s grip on controlling the propaganda may be weakening, but there is still no foolproof method for making a connection with each and every voter except by the old-fashioned, time-tested, and well-proven method of canvassing the electorate.

How did the progressives overtake the DNC? How did ACORN and affiliates orchestrate the protests in Madison, WI, and now Wall Street, manufacture faux outrage to have Hank Williams, Jr., thrown off ESPN, and lean on Bart Stupak, Ben Nelson, and Joe Lieberman to pass Obamacare? How does the Left repeatedly squeeze victories out of close elections and pull upsets in safe states? They do it through a savvy application of technology to their organizing and mobilizing. For the last ten years, the Left has been using VoteBuilder, dubbed by some as “Obama’s secret weapon.” VoteBuilder is without question the premiere election/campaign software out there, and its unique collaborative structure enables various faction groups to pool their efforts and ally themselves on the issues where their interests overlap.

How the Right has Lost

Despite being repeatedly out-maneuvered and out-flanked by the Left, we have clung for far too long to the outdated program Voter Vault 3 to manage voter data on the Republican side. Notwithstanding several upgrades, the latest iteration of Voter Vault is still outdated, inefficient, and woefully inadequate to manage a robust campaign.

Enter rVotes

In the course of my research into a superior database platform during my most recent bout of citizen activism, I stumbled across rVotes, which is without a doubt the wave of the future for successful retail politicking on the Right.

rVotes was created by the founder of VoteBuilder, Steve Adler. He has been thoroughly vetted by such reputable sources as The Voices of America, the Ohio Liberty Council, and Ron Robinson of PROCINCT, not to mention participating Republican candidates in Rhode Island, who enjoyed an unprecedented degree of success in the election of 2010 thanks to rVotes. In the course of my research, I spoke with numerous players in Arizona and Ohio, who were able to give me a good perspective on rVotes and reassure me that this was not some fly-by-night shoestring operation but was in fact the real deal.

Here is an article, replete with links, which sums up the history and background of rVotes and VoteBuilder.

The concept of what rVotes is and what it can do for the Right might seem overwhelming, but history buffs and political junkies won’t want to miss a sliver of this intrigue, nor fail to apprehend the crux of our political woes: OFA works in cooperation with the DNC and other Leftist groups to manipulate our political process, influence politicians’ votes, and throw elections. The Left does not have the advantage over us in the arena of ideas or in strength of numbers. What they do have is the determination to advance their agenda using the best tools at their disposal, and the cleverness to have spotted this dynamic ten years ago, while the GOP was still busy embracing the ineffectual corpse of Voter Vault. And the RNC/GOP seem to have made the calculated decision to hobble along, losing an unacceptable margin of elections and issues, rather than relinquish their death grip on their power structure. Many find that absolutely shameless and despicable.

A note on the beauties of free-market capitalism and caveat emptor: I did come across several other campaign software programs out there, but as I’ve discovered, ever since Adler pioneered his ground-breaking technology, there has sprung up a cottage industry of knock-offs, all decidedly inferior in functionality and effectiveness. The only place where these knock-offs seem to outshine rVotes is in their presentation, which in my opinion is an unfortunate marketing decision: gloss over an inferior product with a slick sales pitch. (A specific and detailed analysis of why rVotes outshines the competition may be found here.)

My assessment of the competition may seem glib or harsh. Unfortunately, many venture capitalists and political players have already become invested in various VoteBuilder imitations, possibly without giving due diligence to research all the options. Now, as to the question of which campaign software the Right should embrace, I'm all for competition and letting the market determine the best product. I have not sat through a test demo of each and every election program out there. However, I've gone straight to the source: rVotes is the original concept, pioneered by the inventor and creator of VoteBuilder, which is the single unified system used by the Left. Just as bank tellers don't need to handle all the varieties of counterfeit money to determine the genuine article, I think it's rather pointless to compare the strengths and weaknesses of the various election programs when there's a proven winner already established. More power to all the investors and venture capitalists who are re-inventing this wheel, but they should take care that they don't mislead about their products' capabilities or unfairly slam the competition.

In Summary

To paraphrase Thomas Paine in The American Crisis, we Hobbits do not lack force, but “a proper application of that force.” It is my firm belief that rVotes will deliver the capacity for that proper application of force we so sorely require. Please don’t take my word for this. Read through the links provided, call the people referenced, ask for a demo of the system, and come to your own conclusions.

Friday, July 22, 2011

Make Your Voice Heard - Communicating With Your Representative 101



Many political pundits and leaders encourage grassroots activism by sounding the alarm about a hot-button issue and adjuring interested parties to "Contact your reps!" and "Burn up those phone lines!" which is a great idea as far as it goes. The problem is that such short-term efforts to mobilize a response can fall short of the larger goal, which should be to have a well-informed populace building a strong relationship of accountability with their elected representatives.

I once worked as an intern at a State Capitol. I know from personal experience that legislators have interns manning the phones, especially when controversial issues come up, for the sole purpose of answering the phone, listening patiently to the constituent share his/her opinion, and putting checkmarks on a list. The running tally of "support/oppose" is reviewed each day in staff meetings and can ultimately influence policy decisions. 

But it's not enough to just swamp the phones with an avalanche of impassioned tirades; we have to clearly articulate our opinion, which takes time, but proves that we take our representatives' representation of us seriously. These people who represent us need to know that we're not just a mob army responding to some talking points from talk radio, whose interest in the matter will die down as soon as the news cycle moves on to another topic. They must comprehend that we are concerned and thoughtful constituents who deserve to be listened to, because we have done our homework and we are paying close attention.

My friends, this takes work. It takes effort. Getting truly involved requires more time and mental energy than merely clicking on an online poll, signing a pledge, forwarding an email, copying and pasting text, or leaving a message on an answering machine. There are no substitutes or shortcuts to seeking out the truth for oneself and formulating one's own independent opinion, but I hope to provide inspiration and encouragement for all good citizens willing to express their enthusiasm and beliefs in a practical and effective fashion.

To that end, I've compiled a short list of what I believe makes for an effective contact with an elected official, along with an example of a real letter I sent to my congressman.

* Make it personal. Start off by establishing your credibility with a personal reference (I voted for you, I was at this rally, I emailed you last year on this issue, etc.) Many legislative offices have caller ID now, and many online contact forms require you to enter your zip code to verify that you are from the right district. In this case, I referenced an email from a previous communication.
* Do your homework. Make sure they know that you are beyond talking points.
* Express support. If possible, show appreciation for their efforts. No one likes to be yelled at, even politicians.
* Explain your opinion. Don't be afraid to remind them that they are your representative and thus beholden to represent you.
* Request feedback. Expect an answer. Your representative works for you. Your tax dollars pay their salary.
* Follow up. Share your opinion with others. Explain your research and your reasoning, encourage friends to do their own research and come to their own conclusions, and suggest that they contact their representative also.

Debt ceiling negotiations, HR 421

Dear Representative Woodall,

Thank you for your letter today stating your position on the current debt crisis. I appreciate your response and I agree with the essence of what you say regarding our obligation to service our debt. I researched HR 421, which you reference, and I believe that that would have been an excellent plan to have in place in time for these ongoing debt talks. Unfortunately, I see that that bill got buried in committee, as no doubt the Democrats did not want to be having the discussion of which spending must be prioritized, thus allowing our president to make threats about withholding social security payments.

My frustration lies with the messaging of the Republican leadership. John Boehner is the Speaker of the House. Why is he not speaking out on this forcefully? He needs to highlight your bill again and again, and point out that Obama's threats would not carry weight if simple, common-sense bills such as HR 421 had been allowed to proceed. You need to articulate your message and get this out there on national TV. If Speaker Boehner does not champion these bills and use his bully pulpit to draw attention to your (meaning the Republicans' in general) attempted accomplishments, then writing these bills and resolutions is nothing more than an empty token.

Please understand that I sympathize greatly with your position, struggling to reconcile your obligations to listen to and honor the demands of your constituents with the reality that pragmatism will get the job done. I recognize the difference between pragmatism and compromise. While I believe that the CC&B was a worthy piece of legislation, the reality that we don't really have the time or the messaging right now to negotiate a balanced budget amendment leads me to fear that the House has been involved in grandstanding and empty gestures. John Boehner's comment on Rush Limbaugh's show today about pursuing a fallback plan confirms this notion.

Here's a good fallback plan that will satisfy most reasonable voters who hitherto would have insisted that raising the debt ceiling was unthinkable; call it the Cut & Breathe plan if you like. How much "unspent" money is left from TARP or the stimulus? I know some was being held back as a slush fund, presumably to be unleashed before next election. Call it out. Call out any remnants of Obama's pet programs in the discretionary budget that haven't already been spent. Write a simple bill, right now, cutting that, and raising the debt ceiling by that much. That will give you breathing room to negotiate further cuts, while demonstrating to the American people that you are being serious about making genuine, real-time budget cuts.

That's it. The general populace will understand and approve this, and the president will veto this at his peril.



Please read the letter I sent to Senator Saxby Chambliss this morning. I will be sharing this message with others to illustrate the importance of keeping thoroughly informed as well as to reassure our elected representatives that we are paying attention and that we will have your back as long as you do the right thing. Thank you again for your efforts on our behalf.

Sincerely,

Concerned Citizen